I've done enough complaining (Government Apps and Potholes, Again!, for example) about the lack of eGovernment initiatives in Fairfax County to make it unsporting not to note this app which I just saw announced on Twitter. Looks a little more staid than I hoped for, but it's a start.

But the rest of America will most likely be left out of all this. Millions are still offline completely, while others can afford only connections over their phone lines or via wireless smartphones. They can thus expect even lower-quality health services, career opportunities, education and entertainment options than they already receive.

The Times had a heartbreaking article on the digital divide in Sunday's edition and had some eye-opening facts on how the move to technology-based services would affect those without access to technology. I was really taken by assertions about regulatory policy in he United States:

The answer to this puzzle is regulatory policy. Over the last 10 years, we have deregulated high-speed Internet access in the hope that competition among providers would protect consumers. The result? We now have neither a functioning competitive market for high-speed wired Internet access nor government oversight.

By contrast, governments that have intervened in high-speed Internet markets have seen higher numbers of people adopting the technology, doing so earlier and at lower subscription charges.

I'd really like to see a response from the business and anti-regulation (and anti health care reform) proponents. Maybe there will be a selection of responses next Sunday.