Today's daily cartoon by Kim Warp. Follow us on Instagram to see more: https://t.co/tlHbQwuaDs pic.twitter.com/ESIFjzhMJJ
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) May 19, 2017
Today's daily cartoon by Kim Warp. Follow us on Instagram to see more: https://t.co/tlHbQwuaDs pic.twitter.com/ESIFjzhMJJ
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) May 19, 2017
“It’s hard being an angry English major.”https://t.co/0v5M6PM8A1 🎨 by @ZachWeiner pic.twitter.com/HwTCi83cmJ
— The YUNiversity (@The_YUNiversity) March 26, 2017
“Perks of Being an English Major”
— Grammar YUNiversity (@The_YUNiversity) December 14, 2016
🖊 by @FLoaBComic pic.twitter.com/KfYDimVpls
But if anything can be treated as a plug-in, it’s learning how to code. It took me 18 months to become proficient as a developer. This isn’t to pretend software development is easy — those were long months, and I never touched the heights of my truly gifted peers. But in my experience, programming lends itself to concentrated self-study in a way that, say, To the Lighthouse or “Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction” do not. To learn how to write code, you need a few good books. To enter the mind of an artist, you need a human guide.For folks like Mr. Khosla, such an approach is dangerous: “If subjects like history and literature are focused on too early, it is easy for someone not to learn to think for themselves and not to question assumptions, conclusions, and expert philosophies.” (Where some of these kill-the-humanities pieces are concerned, the strongest case for the liberal arts is made just in trying to read them.)
"To Write Better Code, Read Virginia Woolf, "J. Bradford Hipps's essay at The New York Times, concludes with a citation of Steve Jobs: "technology alone is not enough — it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our heart sing.”
From today's Writer's Amanac—